Indian 2G Spectrum Scam: Crony Capitalism on Display?
	
 
			 | 
			 
	 | 
			
 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
  
Case Details:
  
Case Code : BECG118 
Case Length : 23 Pages 
Period : 2007-2011 
Organization : Companies operating in  the Indian telecom sector 
Pub Date : 2011 
Teaching Note : Available(11 Pages) 
Countries : India 
Industry : Telecom 
 
To download Indian 2G Spectrum Scam: Crony Capitalism on Display? case study 
(Case Code: BECG118) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases: 
  
  
 OR
	
		
  
Buy With PayPal
 | 
	 
 
Price:
  
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500 ; 
For delivery through Shipping & Handling Charges extra: Rs. 500 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra 
 
 
 »Business Ethics Case Studies » Case Studies Collection 
 » ICMR Home 
 » View Detailed Pricing Info  » How To Order This Case   » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area 
» Case Studies by Industry 
» Case Studies by Company 
 
 
Please note:
  
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
  
  
Chat with us
  
  
 
Please leave your feedback
  
 
  | 
		
		
| 
 
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
  
<< Previous 
Introduction cont...
	
		| 
		
 
The Government of India (GoI) led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh found itself faced with corruption charges. It was alleged that the Minister of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT), Andimuthu Raja (Raja), had granted telecom operating licenses and allotted spectrum arbitrarily on a First-Come-First-Served basis, paying no heed to advice from the Prime Minister and other ministries that an open auction be held. Across the world, spectrum, which is treated as a scarce natural resource, is generally auctioned and given to the highest bidders, but in India, the MCIT allocated spectrum to various companies between November 2007 and December 2010 at price levels agreed to in 2001 without any bids being called for. A preliminary 
		 | 
		
		   
		
		 | 
	 
 
report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)6 , a federal agency for auditing public accounts, computed the loss to the exchequer at around US$40 billion (Rs7  1760 billion) due to the MCIT favoring allocation rather than open auctioning8.  Further, it was also alleged that the MCIT had flouted guidelines and eligibility conditions, altered cut-off dates (for receiving applications), and tweaked procedural conditions, resulting in unfair advantages to certain companies. Following the allegations, Raja was forced to step down from the MCIT and in 2011, was facing corruption charges.
  
The Supreme Court of India, in December 2010, stated that it was prima facie satisfied that irregularities had been committed in the allocation of 2G9  spectrum by Raja. The Court also ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)10  to conduct a comprehensive investigation to bring the wrong-doers to justice.
 
 
Excerpts
- Next Page>> 
 | 
			 
				 |